| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
L.Piper
Toolkit Team
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Pan-caking , another look. Could it possibly work Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 6:08pm |
Pan-caking , another look. Could it possibly work ? PROBLEM …..Pan-caking. PROBABLE CAUSE…. I think it is pretty generally accepted, certainly within this Forum, that the main cause of the trouble is that of the two sheets of the appliance get stuck together by waste matter. Just how this starts is a matter of some conjecture, but it does happen and the task is how to overcome this problem, several ideas, lubricants etc. have been tried all with varying degrees of success. I put forward this idea for a general kick around, could it work ? CONSTRUCTION The bag to be constructed with three sheets. The rear sheet as normal. The center sheet to be free hanging on a draw-string that comes in on one side of front sheet and exits on the opposite side . The draw-string would have to enter and exit through dense rubber discs that would allow a seal of string ,and seal up when draw string is removed. The draw-string itself would have to be something very strong such as nylon ,catgut or material used for medical sutures etc. THEORY The user becomes aware that there is a pan-caking situation developing, with no deposits in bottom of bag, and becoming obvious that the dreaded “ Mushroom ”is forming between the stoma and the front sheet. ( Which is now a double sheet. ) The user now pulls out the draw string thus allowing the center sheet to fall with waste attached to the bottom of bag. FOR……… Very little in bulk or weight. AGAINST….It might work once, would further output of waste follow to bottom of bag. Simple line drawing attached to give some idea how it would function. Len. Explanatory notes of diagram ------------------------------------ . Green Central Sheet, ( Colour only to show general idea ) No 1.….Dense rubber discs, to allow seal around Draw-String. No 2.…Draw-String, can be pulled either way, ease of use for left handed users.
|
|
Colostomy...1997...Cancer
|
|
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 289
|
 |
XP_dkbva
Moderator Group
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 6:32pm |
Interesting idea L. Piper
I agree that the cause of pancaking is the films sticking together however it often happens when there is no air in the bag - looks like vacuum. Have you ever had pancaking with air in the bag??
The challenge might be following:
1) The string - and the hole in the bag - might be difficult to close it 100% and avoid smell or?
2) If there is a pancaking situation there is usually no air in the bag, and it is therefore difficult to make the sheet fall to the buttom of the bag ....or what do you think?
But a funny and clever idea!
I know it would be nice to solve the pancaking problem ...would there be anything we could do to prevent the feaces to go underneath the base plate? Have you tried different appliances and are there anything which works better??
Just a question from a curious engineer 
/Bii
|
|
Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 21
|
 |
L.Piper
Toolkit Team
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jul 2010 at 5:02pm |
Hello Bii, Thank you for your input, it is great to get some interaction with you guys up there ! ! ! I have for some time now, thought if we had some physical connection with the happenings within our bags, and in some way could alter, or adjust things, it would overcome so many problems ....hence the draw- string idea. ( 1 ) Now I take your point, I agree with you it would need a little trial and error to get right, I reckoned on the use of rubber discs for the entrance/exit holes , thinking in terms of at least 4mm thick, this of course would depend on the material chosen for " string " but if threaded through rubber with a good tight fit I would think it a fair chance of success. After all we are not talking high pressure here. ( 2 ) It has been my own experience that it is true quite often, there does seem to be a vacuum within the bag at the same time as a major pancaking , however personally, I have found this not always the case, especially in the early stages, I rather suspect the vacuum is the result not the cause of the problem. ( Very interesting " chicken and egg " situation here. ) With reference to your question of different appliances, believe me if they are out there I've tried them. I do not think there is anything one can do once the pancaking is established, the build up of pressure inside of the stoma is going to force a passage somewhere for the waste to exit, the base plate is therefore the only place to go....and it usually does. I am busy at the moment, carrying out some modifications to a bag, intending to try test the theory of the draw string, will keep you posted if I ever find the courage to test fly it. Thanks again....L EN
|
|
Colostomy...1997...Cancer
|
|
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 289
|
 |
arthur
Challenge/Contest Panel
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jul 2010 at 8:48pm |
Not sure if it is vacuum that is causing the problem,
I am wondering if static electricity may be playing some part.
Perhaps some one who has trouble with pancacking could try stroking a magnet across the pouch.
As this is not a problem area for me at this time I am unable to try this.
Arthur
|
|
Arthur N
|
|
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Location: West Midlands UK
Posts: 22
|
 |
L.Piper
Toolkit Team
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 12:38pm |
Hi arthur, Sorry! don't think your theory stands up ref. static, if you are suggesting the front film is attracted to back film that way. IF, the two films were separate sheets,and insulated from each other, this might be a possibility, although I have great doubts on this, however this is not the case, once the two sheets are welded, they become one sheet, any static in either sheet would then be quite unable to attract the other. I have by the way, tried to generate static on a new sheet of the plastic used for constructing bags, I have to say personally I had no success, would be interesting if others have tried. Keep thinking........Len.
|
|
Colostomy...1997...Cancer
|
|
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 289
|
 |
arthur
Challenge/Contest Panel
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Jul 2010 at 2:39am |
I was not thinking specifically that the front sheet was attracted to the back sheet, when I have had a pancake the waste has forced the sheets apart but still the waste has remained around the stoma outlet.
I wondered if the waste could have a positive or negative charge and the pouch material also hold a charge.
If a charge was postive on the waste and negative on the pouch could it attract.
Is this an area that the Lab people mght have tested?
arthur
|
|
Arthur N
|
|
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Location: West Midlands UK
Posts: 22
|
 |
L.Piper
Toolkit Team
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Sep 2010 at 6:52pm |
To all followers of this thread....... Re. reply to XP-dkbva 22 July. Today is the chosen day of the " test flight ".... will keep you posted. .  Len.
Edited by L.Piper - 05 Sep 2010 at 6:57pm
|
|
Colostomy...1997...Cancer
|
|
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 289
|
 |
Bert
Admin Group
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Sep 2010 at 8:32pm |
We're curious! Any luck pulling those strings?  Cheers, bert
|
|
1998 colitis
1999 temp. ileostomy & Jpouch
2003 exit J-pouch and end-ileostomy
|
|
Joined: 16 Feb 2009
Location: Chilliwack BC, Canada
Posts: 1186
|
 |
L.Piper
Toolkit Team
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: Today at 4:33pm |
Well here we go Bert... May I first state that at no time during the recent “test flight ”did I have to deploy the ejector seat or resort to a parachute. That being said I shall now report my findings…. The modified appliance (photo attached ) was fitted at or around 8am . Normal duties were carried out throughout morning, including gardening, washing car and shampooing the dining room carpet. During this time there was no trace of odour, the normal filters worked well. By 11-30 it was noticeable that there were no deposits in bottom of bag, a good sign that I had picked a good day to test the pancaking scenario. Fairly heavy lunch at 1 pm, it was now clear that the “ mushroom “ was beginning to form. ( All those who are cursed with this problem will know what I mean. ) Continued duties until about 4 pm ,when it was clearly apparent I had a full scale pancaking developing. At this stage the normal filters were working perfectly well, there being no odour problems at all. At 6 pm I pulled out draw string , everything going fine and according to plan. About an hour after removing draw string it was quite obvious that a major pancaking was now developing and it was also obvious that my theory was beginning to go “ pear shaped “. At 9 pm the appliance was changed, the pressure at rear of blockage was building , and waste had now forced between the flange and flesh , it would only have been a matter of time before a full blow out. Upon close scrutiny of appliance after removal it was clear that although the draw string removed perfectly as planned , the center sheet had not dropped at all., waste matter had worked its way around whole assembly, and it was one solid mass. As per mushroom head. It was also noted that the remainder of the interior of the bag was completely airless, complete vacuum as far as one could determine. In conclusion I would say Bii was quite correct in his conclusion that the center sheet would fail to drop, on removal of cord. I did find that the odour seal of draw string through rubber seal, was not an issue. As for myself…..it’s back to the drawing board With regard to the question..." could it possibly work " on this occasion I can only and sadly say NO. Len....
|
|
Colostomy...1997...Cancer
|
|
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 289
|
 |
ileoguy
Member
Online Status: Offline
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: Today at 7:19pm |
|
Len,
Sorry the experiment didn't prove successful, not panning out, if you will... Thanks for the valiant effort.
A simple question which, as an ileostomate, I must ask: What seems to be the aversion amongst many colostomates to open-ended pouches? Wouldn't that solve the vacuum problem and provide for the effluent to be emptied before severe pancaking could occur with the possible resulting blow-out? It seems like a simple and readily available solution to a common problem.
What am I missing here?
Thanks, Len.
Best, Ileoguy
|
|
Why should we limit ourselves to convention? Just ask yourself, "What would MacGyver do?"
|
|
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 211
|
 |